Drawing Fictional Characters and Imagining Them

Drawing Fictional Characters and Imagining Them

Question

I am a creative person and enjoy designing my own characters. I understand that there are Islamic rulings concerning drawing living beings, but my characters are fictional and are not similar to the creation of Allah. I have also become attached to these characters in my imagination. Sometimes I feel as though they are with me or looking at me, similar to imaginary friends, although I know they are not actually real. Is drawing such characters sinful, and is having these thoughts or imagining them sinful?

Answer

Alhamdulillah, wassalatu wassalamu ala rasulillah, wa ala alihi wa sahbihi ajma’in.

There are two separate matters in this question: the ruling on drawing fictional characters and the thoughts and imaginative experiences involving those characters. They should not be treated as though they have the same ruling.

1. The Shari Context Regarding Images

There are authentic hadith containing strong warnings regarding taswir, particularly the making of images of beings possessing souls.

The Prophet ﷺ said:

“The people who will receive the severest punishment on the Day of Resurrection are the image-makers.”
Sahih al-Bukhari and Sahih Muslim

He ﷺ also mentioned those who attempt to imitate the creation of Allah.

Classical jurists therefore discussed images of humans and animals extensively. The majority understood complete representations of animate beings to fall within the prohibition, particularly when they contain the features by which the being is recognized as living.

However, the jurists also discussed incomplete figures, children’s toys, images without essential features, and representations that do not constitute a complete living creature.

2. Fictional Creatures That Do Not Exist in Reality

Simply making a creature fictional does not necessarily remove it from the discussion of taswir.

For example, drawing a fictional person, dragon, or human-like creature may still represent an animate being even though that particular creature does not exist in the real world.

Therefore, the issue is not merely whether the character resembles a particular person or animal created by Allah. The question is whether the drawing constitutes the representation of a complete animate being.

There is, however, greater scope where the design is genuinely abstract, highly stylized, incomplete, or lacks essential features of a living creature.

3. Incomplete or Non-Lifelike Characters

Classical jurists recognized an important distinction concerning an image from which an essential part of life is absent.

It is reported from Ibn Abbas, when asked about making images, that he instructed the questioner that if he had to do so, he should make images of trees and things without souls.

Jurists also discussed the hadith:

“The image is the head. If the head is removed, there is no image.”

On this basis, many scholars permitted or were considerably more lenient regarding representations that are incomplete in a manner in which the depicted creature could not ordinarily live.

Therefore, if someone’s artwork consists of unusual fictional designs that do not actually represent complete humans, animals, or recognizable animate creatures, there can be greater scope for permissibility.

Merely changing the colour, proportions, clothing, ears, or other features of an otherwise complete living character, however, would not necessarily take it outside the ruling of animate images.

4. There Is Also Contemporary Scholarly Disagreement

It should also be recognized that contemporary scholars differ regarding modern drawing and digital illustration.

Some maintain the classical prohibition broadly and include hand-drawn and digital representations of complete animate beings.

Others distinguish between prohibited image-making intended to imitate Allah’s creation, statues and revered images on one hand, and ordinary illustration, cartoons, educational drawings, and digital artwork on the other. According to this more lenient contemporary position, such drawings may be permissible provided their subject matter and purpose are themselves permissible.

Therefore, the statement that every form of character drawing is unanimously haram is too broad. There is genuine contemporary scholarly disagreement regarding the application of the classical texts to many modern forms of illustration.

A person who wishes to follow the more cautious position can design characters without complete animate features or focus on non-animate, abstract, environmental, architectural, or similar designs.

5. Imagining the Characters Is a Separate Matter

Having characters in one’s imagination is not taswir in the legal sense.

A person may imagine stories, places, conversations, characters, or entire fictional worlds. Human imagination itself is not prohibited.

The Prophet ﷺ said:

“Allah has pardoned my Ummah for what occurs within themselves, so long as they do not speak of it or act upon it.”
Sahih al-Bukhari and Sahih Muslim

Therefore, merely having these characters repeatedly appear in your thoughts is not a sin.

You should not continuously inspect your thoughts to determine whether you have committed something haram simply because a particular image or character entered your mind.

6. Feeling That the Characters Are Around You

The statement that you sometimes feel as though the characters are “looking at you” or “always with you” should also not immediately be interpreted as something supernatural or as evidence that you have committed a religious sin.

If you understand that these characters are products of your imagination and do not believe that they actually exist around you, then having a vivid imagination, becoming absorbed in fictional characters, or experiencing persistent mental imagery is not itself sinful.

Islam does not hold a person accountable merely for involuntary thoughts, mental images, or feelings.

If, however, these experiences become difficult to control, cause significant anxiety, interfere with everyday life, or begin to feel genuinely real rather than imaginative, it would be sensible to speak with a qualified healthcare professional. Seeking such help does not contradict reliance upon Allah.

7. Relevant Usul Principle

A relevant principle is:

الأمور بمقاصدها

“Matters are judged according to their purposes.”

The purpose and nature of artistic work therefore matter when considering its ruling, alongside the form of the image itself.

Regarding involuntary thoughts, another important principle is:

لا تكليف إلا بمقدور

“There is no legal responsibility except regarding what is within a person’s capacity.”

Islamic accountability concerns what a person intentionally chooses. Thoughts, images, and feelings that arise involuntarily in the mind are not treated as deliberate actions.

Final Ruling

Merely imagining fictional characters, feeling emotionally attached to them, or having them repeatedly appear in your thoughts is not sinful. These thoughts should not be confused with the Islamic ruling concerning making physical or digital images.

Regarding drawing, there is genuine scholarly discussion. According to the stricter classical approach, drawing a complete animate being remains problematic even when the particular character is fictional. Merely making the character unusual or unlike an existing person does not necessarily remove the prohibition.

There is greater scope where the character is genuinely abstract, incomplete, or lacks essential features of an animate being. There is also a more lenient contemporary scholarly position permitting ordinary illustrations and fictional characters when they are not objects of worship or glorification and contain nothing independently prohibited.

If you choose to follow the cautious position, you can continue using your creativity while designing characters in forms that do not constitute complete representations of animate beings.

As for the characters appearing frequently in your imagination, you are not committing a sin simply because your mind produces these thoughts. Do not treat involuntary imagination as though it were an act for which Allah will hold you accountable.

And Allah knows best.


Answered by:
Dr. Mahmoud A. Omar
Islamic Jurist and Mufti
Al-Azhar Fatwa Council Member

Methodology:
This fatwa is based on the Qur’an, the Sunnah, and the established principles of Islamic jurisprudence (Usool), with consideration of contemporary circumstances.